
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>arch-online.org - your guide to disability rights and  disability truths. &#187; Disability &amp; The Internet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arch-online.org/category/disability-the-internet/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arch-online.org</link>
	<description>Your guide to disability rights and  disability truths.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2010 23:41:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Disabled peoples rights to web access</title>
		<link>http://arch-online.org/disability-internet-access-legal-rights.htm</link>
		<comments>http://arch-online.org/disability-internet-access-legal-rights.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 04:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Disability & The Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disability Facts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arch-online.org/?p=28</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Disability &#38; The Internet
A study has recently shown that despite new laws        under the disability discrimination act many websites are still inadequate        when it comes to providing suitable access for those with disabilities.
Since 2003 the disability rights commission began testing websites [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Disability &amp; The Internet</strong></p>
<p><span class="bodytext">A study has recently shown that despite new laws        under the disability discrimination act many websites are still inadequate        when it comes to providing suitable access for those with disabilities.</span></p>
<p>Since 2003 the disability rights commission began testing websites to make        sure they were complying with guidelines set out by the World Wide Web Consortium&#8217;s        Web Content Accessibility programme. Of 1,000 sites tested 81% of them failed        to reach the minimum standard of accessibility.</p>
<p><span class="bodytext"> <strong>How Testing Was Done? </strong></span></p>
<p>Testing was done running commercial available software on each of the 1,000        sites, testing included for example images on websites, such images on web        pages should have what is described as an &#8220;Alt-tag&#8221; included for the use        of blind or visually impaired people and is a text alternative which is        a description of the image on the page.</p>
<p>The &#8220;Alt-tag&#8221; is read using a screen reader. Of the sites tested 100 of        them were also tested manually by a disabled user group with disabilities        ranging from dexterity impairments, blindness, partial sight, dyslexia and        hearing impairments.</p>
<p>A large number of the websites which did have the &#8220;Alt-tag&#8221; feature were        found to be wrong in matching the actual description with the image, for        example the picture could be a cat and the description was dog.</p>
<p>Along with problems such as this the people testing also found many other        problems such as cluttered and complex web page designs, confusing and disorienting        navigation systems, and failure to describe images at all along with poor        contrast between the background pages and content which made reading hard.</p>
<p>The research concluded that on average 8 instances of the guidelines put        in place were being violated per homepage, and also found on average a potential        108 instances on the typical homepage where a disabled person would have        particular trouble because of there disability.</p>
<p>Only 2 web sites out of the 1,000 tested actually reached the second highest        level AA and not one of the sites tested managed to reach the top level.</p>
<p>When these findings where brought to light the DRC warned that hundreds        of businesses may not be complying with equal access law for the disabled        and that it was inevitable that they would face legal action from their        disabled customers at some stage.</p>
<p><strong>The Legal Obligation</strong></p>
<p>The disability discrimination act states that it is unlawful for a provider        of services to discriminate against a disabled person in failing to comply        with its provisions.</p>
<p><span class="bodytext">Filed under: <em>Disability &amp; The Internet</em></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://arch-online.org/disability-internet-access-legal-rights.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

