
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Truth About Social Security Disability Insurance.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arch-online.org/the-truth-about-social-security-disability-insurance.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arch-online.org/the-truth-about-social-security-disability-insurance.htm</link>
	<description>Your guide to disability rights and  disability truths.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:44:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: MJ</title>
		<link>http://arch-online.org/the-truth-about-social-security-disability-insurance.htm/comment-page-1#comment-3067</link>
		<dc:creator>MJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 02:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arch-online.org/?p=134#comment-3067</guid>
		<description>I think there is some useful information on this site, but some of it simply isn&#039;t true.  I don&#039;t think it is on purpose, necessarily.  Nonetheless, misinformation at times only serves to further scare people of the process.

SSI is actually Supplemental Security Income.  The two descriptions of SSDI are incorrect.  One of them you do have to be found disabled before age 22 so you can qualify for benefits under another wage earners benefits if you were/are dependent on them and they become disabled themselves, retire, or die.  The other SSDI is simply what you pay into as a worker and you are eligible to collect on it as early as age 18...you don&#039;t have to be over 22 or found disabled after age 22.

The author notes redeterminations occur every 1-2 years.  They generally occur every 3 years (normal) or 7 years for more permanent conditions (e.g. severe mental retardation).  A review at the 1 or 2 year mark would be in the case of a bone marrow transplant or another recent treatment.  Another example would be if the claimant was improving but evidence showed he/she was already disabled for 12 months or more or was expected to be disabled for 12 months or more.

I can appreciate the poster&#039;s frustration over the limited acceptance of chiropractor notes.  However, they are not trained medical doctors and do not have the same expertise to treat, diagnose, and state functional impairments.  It is not a slam on them, but it is just what it is.  I like chiropractors myself and have used them several times, but this is why they aren&#039;t used by themselves in the evaluation of your impairment(s).  Also, sometimes the consultative exam doctors aren&#039;t the best, but they don&#039;t make the determination as to whether or not you are disabled.  The adjudicator receives a copy of the x-ray report and a copy of objective findings from the consultative exam doctor...as well as your own reports on symptoms.  

Many cases aren&#039;t clear, cut, and dry.  Adjudicators don&#039;t get bonuses or otherwise receive some kind of credit for denying more claimants.  The burden of proof for allowing claimants is indeed tough, especially for those under 50.  Nonetheless, adjudicatos face high case loads and most do the best they can.

My suggestion is to be as prepared as possible.  Work with your doctors to prepare strong medical source statements indicating what you are still capable of doing and what you can&#039;t do any longer.  A doctor letter saying &quot;Mr. Smith is permanently disabled and can&#039;t perform any work activities&quot; is 100% meaningless.  Please, reread that.  Your doctor is trying to help you, but a letter with just that does nothing to help your case.  The letters need to be specific and state objective findings, what you can and cannot do, why, effects of treatment, what has and hasn&#039;t worked, prognosis, etc.  It should be stated in the terms of what is the most you can reasonably be expected to do in an 8-hour workday through a normal 40-hour workweek.  Pain, fatigue, and sustainability should be taken into account and addressed.  It would also be good to have multiple letters from more than one doctor...if you have more than one doctor.  You will want to educate yourself on what type of letter will help you here and what won&#039;t.  If they say you can lift and carry 10 pounds frequently and 20 pounds occasionally, as well as stand/walk 6 hours out of an 8-hour workday...then for most everyone under 55 that will result in a denial.  Medical source statement letters for psych impairments are also very valuable...if not more so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there is some useful information on this site, but some of it simply isn&#8217;t true.  I don&#8217;t think it is on purpose, necessarily.  Nonetheless, misinformation at times only serves to further scare people of the process.</p>
<p>SSI is actually Supplemental Security Income.  The two descriptions of SSDI are incorrect.  One of them you do have to be found disabled before age 22 so you can qualify for benefits under another wage earners benefits if you were/are dependent on them and they become disabled themselves, retire, or die.  The other SSDI is simply what you pay into as a worker and you are eligible to collect on it as early as age 18&#8230;you don&#8217;t have to be over 22 or found disabled after age 22.</p>
<p>The author notes redeterminations occur every 1-2 years.  They generally occur every 3 years (normal) or 7 years for more permanent conditions (e.g. severe mental retardation).  A review at the 1 or 2 year mark would be in the case of a bone marrow transplant or another recent treatment.  Another example would be if the claimant was improving but evidence showed he/she was already disabled for 12 months or more or was expected to be disabled for 12 months or more.</p>
<p>I can appreciate the poster&#8217;s frustration over the limited acceptance of chiropractor notes.  However, they are not trained medical doctors and do not have the same expertise to treat, diagnose, and state functional impairments.  It is not a slam on them, but it is just what it is.  I like chiropractors myself and have used them several times, but this is why they aren&#8217;t used by themselves in the evaluation of your impairment(s).  Also, sometimes the consultative exam doctors aren&#8217;t the best, but they don&#8217;t make the determination as to whether or not you are disabled.  The adjudicator receives a copy of the x-ray report and a copy of objective findings from the consultative exam doctor&#8230;as well as your own reports on symptoms.  </p>
<p>Many cases aren&#8217;t clear, cut, and dry.  Adjudicators don&#8217;t get bonuses or otherwise receive some kind of credit for denying more claimants.  The burden of proof for allowing claimants is indeed tough, especially for those under 50.  Nonetheless, adjudicatos face high case loads and most do the best they can.</p>
<p>My suggestion is to be as prepared as possible.  Work with your doctors to prepare strong medical source statements indicating what you are still capable of doing and what you can&#8217;t do any longer.  A doctor letter saying &#8220;Mr. Smith is permanently disabled and can&#8217;t perform any work activities&#8221; is 100% meaningless.  Please, reread that.  Your doctor is trying to help you, but a letter with just that does nothing to help your case.  The letters need to be specific and state objective findings, what you can and cannot do, why, effects of treatment, what has and hasn&#8217;t worked, prognosis, etc.  It should be stated in the terms of what is the most you can reasonably be expected to do in an 8-hour workday through a normal 40-hour workweek.  Pain, fatigue, and sustainability should be taken into account and addressed.  It would also be good to have multiple letters from more than one doctor&#8230;if you have more than one doctor.  You will want to educate yourself on what type of letter will help you here and what won&#8217;t.  If they say you can lift and carry 10 pounds frequently and 20 pounds occasionally, as well as stand/walk 6 hours out of an 8-hour workday&#8230;then for most everyone under 55 that will result in a denial.  Medical source statement letters for psych impairments are also very valuable&#8230;if not more so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: terrified by upcoming redetermination</title>
		<link>http://arch-online.org/the-truth-about-social-security-disability-insurance.htm/comment-page-1#comment-2364</link>
		<dc:creator>terrified by upcoming redetermination</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 21:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arch-online.org/?p=134#comment-2364</guid>
		<description>Sorry for submitting twice. After I posted, I called my redetermination case manager and found myself letting her know how I felt. She told me that 99% of redeterminations result in no changes to disability status, that when they are denied that there has been a substantial improvement in the person&#039;s condition, that I wasn&#039;t one of the 1% people and that I had no reason to worry.  I am very glad that I decided to call and face my worst fears, am certain that I am not alone in my reaction (given that people in pain do commit suicide at alarmingly higher rates than is normal), and simply wanted to say that I am going to take her advice not to torment myself and to let others know what I found out from my case worker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for submitting twice. After I posted, I called my redetermination case manager and found myself letting her know how I felt. She told me that 99% of redeterminations result in no changes to disability status, that when they are denied that there has been a substantial improvement in the person&#8217;s condition, that I wasn&#8217;t one of the 1% people and that I had no reason to worry.  I am very glad that I decided to call and face my worst fears, am certain that I am not alone in my reaction (given that people in pain do commit suicide at alarmingly higher rates than is normal), and simply wanted to say that I am going to take her advice not to torment myself and to let others know what I found out from my case worker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: terrified by upcoming redetermination</title>
		<link>http://arch-online.org/the-truth-about-social-security-disability-insurance.htm/comment-page-1#comment-2362</link>
		<dc:creator>terrified by upcoming redetermination</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 18:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arch-online.org/?p=134#comment-2362</guid>
		<description>I am up for redetermination, so have been researching like mad. You&#039;re certainly right about symptoms worsening due to the process of having to prove I am still disabled. Other than spiraling out-of-control pain (which I had dealt with enough that I could actually be present in my body without acute anxiety, fear and being triggered by PTSD constantly), I find myself terrified that I will find myself without benefits after going to the 2 independant medical evals in the next couple of weeks).  

My terror stems from my absolute inability to work and, without continuing benefits, I cannot envision any sort of future and am finding myself seriously planning suicide should I be denied.  I cannot think of any way around this end: either I continue to eke out a meager existence, finding what pleasure and usefulness I can out of life, or I give up my life as I will not be able to provide shelter, food or anything for myself. All of my conditions are at red-alert status, every gain I have made is gone.  I can see no alternative for myself right now. 

My quality of life is such that I have made all the concessions I can, all of the internal negotiating of which I am capable and, together with everything in my life going as wrong as it can within a couple of years, I was already fragile. I was already racheting up on symptoms when I learned I would have to prove, once again - and in this economy - that I was unable to work. I have few medical records for the last few years as I have grown increasingly frustrated with the inability of the medical community to help, have become paranoid of medications, so I feel really screwed about documenting my current situation. 

Any tips on increasing the odds that I can insure my being able to continue on disability?  I tend to be so ashamed of being disabled or of being viewed as weak, am so good at disassociating, that I often appear to be fine by hiding my symptoms and condition for short periods of time, and isolate when I cannot.  Anything?  Thanks much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am up for redetermination, so have been researching like mad. You&#8217;re certainly right about symptoms worsening due to the process of having to prove I am still disabled. Other than spiraling out-of-control pain (which I had dealt with enough that I could actually be present in my body without acute anxiety, fear and being triggered by PTSD constantly), I find myself terrified that I will find myself without benefits after going to the 2 independant medical evals in the next couple of weeks).  </p>
<p>My terror stems from my absolute inability to work and, without continuing benefits, I cannot envision any sort of future and am finding myself seriously planning suicide should I be denied.  I cannot think of any way around this end: either I continue to eke out a meager existence, finding what pleasure and usefulness I can out of life, or I give up my life as I will not be able to provide shelter, food or anything for myself. All of my conditions are at red-alert status, every gain I have made is gone.  I can see no alternative for myself right now. </p>
<p>My quality of life is such that I have made all the concessions I can, all of the internal negotiating of which I am capable and, together with everything in my life going as wrong as it can within a couple of years, I was already fragile. I was already racheting up on symptoms when I learned I would have to prove, once again &#8211; and in this economy &#8211; that I was unable to work. I have few medical records for the last few years as I have grown increasingly frustrated with the inability of the medical community to help, have become paranoid of medications, so I feel really screwed about documenting my current situation. </p>
<p>Any tips on increasing the odds that I can insure my being able to continue on disability?  I tend to be so ashamed of being disabled or of being viewed as weak, am so good at disassociating, that I often appear to be fine by hiding my symptoms and condition for short periods of time, and isolate when I cannot.  Anything?  Thanks much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frustrated</title>
		<link>http://arch-online.org/the-truth-about-social-security-disability-insurance.htm/comment-page-1#comment-2214</link>
		<dc:creator>frustrated</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 10:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arch-online.org/?p=134#comment-2214</guid>
		<description>If you happen to be on SSD, have minor children then die, there are no benefits for the minor children left behind. The SSD check does not go to the children. My daughters father had been disabled since 17 yrs old, was on SSD under parents work record. WHen he died and left behind a 13 yr old child who happens to be Learning disabled and I went to see about her getting his check I was told no. I sure dont understand it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you happen to be on SSD, have minor children then die, there are no benefits for the minor children left behind. The SSD check does not go to the children. My daughters father had been disabled since 17 yrs old, was on SSD under parents work record. WHen he died and left behind a 13 yr old child who happens to be Learning disabled and I went to see about her getting his check I was told no. I sure dont understand it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hurt</title>
		<link>http://arch-online.org/the-truth-about-social-security-disability-insurance.htm/comment-page-1#comment-2106</link>
		<dc:creator>Hurt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 23:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arch-online.org/?p=134#comment-2106</guid>
		<description>I am currently permantly disabled and my benefits put me in the lowest bracket of the income scale.  The help I recieve is not even enough to live by.  How can the goverment say that welfare disability people are getting half of the taxes america pays...it is not so.  Government aid employees paychecks are far more than welfare recipients recieve.  The more yo Should recieve....the less you get.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am currently permantly disabled and my benefits put me in the lowest bracket of the income scale.  The help I recieve is not even enough to live by.  How can the goverment say that welfare disability people are getting half of the taxes america pays&#8230;it is not so.  Government aid employees paychecks are far more than welfare recipients recieve.  The more yo Should recieve&#8230;.the less you get.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://arch-online.org/the-truth-about-social-security-disability-insurance.htm/comment-page-1#comment-1772</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 00:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arch-online.org/?p=134#comment-1772</guid>
		<description>My chiropractor told me I had arthritis in both hips and told me to stop working since I can not get up after sitting without great difficulty.  He told me not to sit or stand for more than 15 minutes at a time.  So after filing for SSD, I was told by SSD that they do not listen to anything a chiropractor says.  I have no health insurance and pay out of pocket for doctors so SSD sent me to their doctor.  What a mistake.  Since SSD pays him he proceeded to lie about my condition to SSD.  The SSD doctor even laughed at me for using a cane, although he did tell me I had arthritis in both hips.  They had me get x-rays which showed them my condition although he never told SSD about the arthritis in both of my hips and evidently no one at SSD looked at the x-rays.  They even hired spies to follow, and film me, and they proceeded to pile on their lies.  Then they sent all of these reports to other SSD doctors for their opinions based on bogus information and lies from the first SSD doctor and SSD spies.  They continued to pile on their lies about my condition, which they call their opinion.  They even had a physiologist on the SSD payroll, who I never met, give their opinion about my condition.  Only one out of all of these SSD doctors examined me, and all of a sudden they are saying I’m a psycho, I‘m depressed, it’s all in my head, and I’m lying to them about my condition.  After my first denial I went to the best Orthopedic Specialists in town who look at the same x-rays SSD had and told me that I not only had arthritis in both hips but I also had bone spurs in both hips.  He told me that it would be impossible for me to work and he put that in his report to SSD.  I brought his report to SSD and they told me that I was already denied for the second time, two months earlier than they said they would make their second determination about me.  I believe they denied me that very day since I had not received the second denial in the mail yet.  I recently hired an attorney although I’m still suffering, can’t work, and now SSD tells me I have to wait another 18 months to go before a judge.  There are times when my hip gets out of place and can not stand up with out the use of a walker.  They do not want to help anyone who is disabled and they do not want to put anyone on SSD.  They have always been rude to me when ever I‘ve gone to their office to discuss the wrong information which they put on their letters of denial.  I guess they need our money for their payroll, conventions and parties.  My opinion of SSD is that they are thoroughly corrupt and they are liars.    God help anyone who has to deal with SSD because it‘s like trying to work with the devil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My chiropractor told me I had arthritis in both hips and told me to stop working since I can not get up after sitting without great difficulty.  He told me not to sit or stand for more than 15 minutes at a time.  So after filing for SSD, I was told by SSD that they do not listen to anything a chiropractor says.  I have no health insurance and pay out of pocket for doctors so SSD sent me to their doctor.  What a mistake.  Since SSD pays him he proceeded to lie about my condition to SSD.  The SSD doctor even laughed at me for using a cane, although he did tell me I had arthritis in both hips.  They had me get x-rays which showed them my condition although he never told SSD about the arthritis in both of my hips and evidently no one at SSD looked at the x-rays.  They even hired spies to follow, and film me, and they proceeded to pile on their lies.  Then they sent all of these reports to other SSD doctors for their opinions based on bogus information and lies from the first SSD doctor and SSD spies.  They continued to pile on their lies about my condition, which they call their opinion.  They even had a physiologist on the SSD payroll, who I never met, give their opinion about my condition.  Only one out of all of these SSD doctors examined me, and all of a sudden they are saying I’m a psycho, I‘m depressed, it’s all in my head, and I’m lying to them about my condition.  After my first denial I went to the best Orthopedic Specialists in town who look at the same x-rays SSD had and told me that I not only had arthritis in both hips but I also had bone spurs in both hips.  He told me that it would be impossible for me to work and he put that in his report to SSD.  I brought his report to SSD and they told me that I was already denied for the second time, two months earlier than they said they would make their second determination about me.  I believe they denied me that very day since I had not received the second denial in the mail yet.  I recently hired an attorney although I’m still suffering, can’t work, and now SSD tells me I have to wait another 18 months to go before a judge.  There are times when my hip gets out of place and can not stand up with out the use of a walker.  They do not want to help anyone who is disabled and they do not want to put anyone on SSD.  They have always been rude to me when ever I‘ve gone to their office to discuss the wrong information which they put on their letters of denial.  I guess they need our money for their payroll, conventions and parties.  My opinion of SSD is that they are thoroughly corrupt and they are liars.    God help anyone who has to deal with SSD because it‘s like trying to work with the devil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://arch-online.org/the-truth-about-social-security-disability-insurance.htm/comment-page-1#comment-1451</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 03:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arch-online.org/?p=134#comment-1451</guid>
		<description>Thanks for dropping by Dominica. I agree, I am not disabled so obviously I could never have the same perspective but what I am trying to do is provide some useful well researched information for people so I believe the comments are definitely valid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for dropping by Dominica. I agree, I am not disabled so obviously I could never have the same perspective but what I am trying to do is provide some useful well researched information for people so I believe the comments are definitely valid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dominica</title>
		<link>http://arch-online.org/the-truth-about-social-security-disability-insurance.htm/comment-page-1#comment-1435</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 13:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arch-online.org/?p=134#comment-1435</guid>
		<description>Although a lot of the things that you are saying are true, it is easy for someone whom never had a disability to easily make comments such as yours. It is only when one experiences it that they can have a valid comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although a lot of the things that you are saying are true, it is easy for someone whom never had a disability to easily make comments such as yours. It is only when one experiences it that they can have a valid comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terrell</title>
		<link>http://arch-online.org/the-truth-about-social-security-disability-insurance.htm/comment-page-1#comment-1224</link>
		<dc:creator>Terrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 14:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arch-online.org/?p=134#comment-1224</guid>
		<description>I know someone who is working and making mad money and collecting SSI and Socail Secuirty and not retired She is 37 I think that is unfair and makes it harder for those who are trying to reseve benefits that are actuallyy disabled</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know someone who is working and making mad money and collecting SSI and Socail Secuirty and not retired She is 37 I think that is unfair and makes it harder for those who are trying to reseve benefits that are actuallyy disabled</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apostille</title>
		<link>http://arch-online.org/the-truth-about-social-security-disability-insurance.htm/comment-page-1#comment-323</link>
		<dc:creator>Apostille</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 21:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arch-online.org/?p=134#comment-323</guid>
		<description>I like the purpose. its true how u mention the its our society the should reevaluate.... but we dont..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the purpose. its true how u mention the its our society the should reevaluate&#8230;. but we dont..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
